Should I write here?

 I am writing here after more than nine years.  After starting this blog, I wrote a few posts and then stopped.  I am not sure why.  Probably because I did not get any benefit out of it. And also because I am uncomfortable casually writing stuff that is open to everyone.  So it is not clear if writing here is something I want to do regularly.

The objectivist ethics by Ayn Rand

The virtue of selfishness by Ayn Rand was a book on my "to-read" list for years now. I finally started reading it. I have only read the first article in the book: The objectivist ethics. Initially I found it a little difficult to read and thought that it is yet another book where the author uses difficult to understand words or concepts. But after page 24 the book got on a roll.

I was swept away by the ideas. And the most wonderful thing was that the writing was pithy. It said a lot in the number of words needed to say a lot. And not like some books that repeat the same thing over and over again in different ways.

I found certain ideas to be a wonderful new way of looking at life. I can't be sure that these ideas are correct. But they certainly provide a point of view that needs to be looked at. One of the ideas as I understood it is that we need to engage our minds to the maximum capacity to be happy. When I read this I wondered whether this is the way to pursue happiness. And regretted not reading this book earlier.

As I read the article, I was aware of my tendency to get carried away, to get influenced quickly. So while I was getting all excited reading the book at night, I decided that the first thing I'll do the next morning is to read criticism for Ayn Rand on the internet.

I did find a lot of criticism. Reading the criticism reminded me of some of my own objections that I brushed aside to get to the essence of what she was trying to say. Reading the criticism also helped me to understand where Ayn Rand's philosophy stands in the general discipline of philosophy.

Our lives are driven by philosophies and hence they should be considered important. It's strange that most of us do not formally study it.

--saurabh

Gmail Priority Inbox

I tried gmail's priority inbox feature. It is wonderful. Just what I needed. Have a look.

Decimeters

I wonder why we don't use decimeters for anything. Both millimeters and centimeters get used for measuring appropriate lengths. But somehow decimeters don't seem to get their due. To measure anything we use units that are appropriate for the typical lengths involved. If we are measuring cloth, we typical use meters for anything that is more than a meter but use centimeters if we are buying a small piece. Dimensions of a mobile are typically measured in millimeters.

So what are the things we can measure in decimeters. I think that height of people can be better measured in decimeters. One of the reasons we still measure height in feet could be that the alternate metric unit people try to use is centimeters which is not very convenient. It is very difficult to get a feel of large numbers like 174 cms. I feel that if decimeters were used and the same height was mentioned as 17.4 dms, people will slowly get a feel for what it means.

We understand feet very well. We understand that most people are between 5 feet and 6 feet height. Average Indian woman is about 5 feet 3 inches and men are about 5 feet 7 inches. People about 6 feet are considered very tall and those below 5 feet are considered short. Consider these thoughts in decimeters. Most people will be between 15 dms and 18 dms. Average Indian woman is about 16 dms, and men are about 17 dms. People above 18 dms are very tall and those below 15 dms are considered short. I find thinking in terms of dms even more convenient than thinking in feets and inches. And it certainly is better than thinking in cms.

We have moved to the metric system for measuring many things that are very short or very long. But feet still rule for things in between. I believe decimeters may help us displace feet. Or perhaps it's the other way around, we do not use decimeters because of the competition from the well established feet.

The Daily Mind

Today I surfed to the blog at www.thedailymind.com. I am impressed with the quality of posts. Have a look.

Retirement !!

I declared my retirement yesterday. The following question usually followed my declaration. What does retirement mean to me? Well, it is no different from a 60 year old guy retiring from a regular job. So I don't feel the need to have a separate meaning for me. I will do whatever makes me happy. I am not sure what will make me happy. I need to figure that out.

Review: Rich Dad Poor Dad

I recently read a book on personal finance titled "Rich Dad Poor Dad" by Robert T. Kiyosaki.  It tells things about personal finance which should be common sense.  It is worth reading the book because it does get you thinking.  Here is what I found useful in the book:

Work to Learn: When you choose a job, do not choose it on the basis of money, rather choose it on the basis of what it will teach you.

Active income is what you work for as an employee or self-employed person.

Passive/portfolio income is generated by your investments or businesses you own.

Invest: You should systematically invest your active income in order to grow your passive/portfolio income.  At the same time avoid buying stuff that will increase your recurring expenses.

Financial independence: When your passive/portfolio income becomes more than your expenses, you become financially independent.  Once you get there, you may choose to retire or do whatever you want.

Buy luxuries last:  First invest then buy luxuries from investment income after you achieve financial independence.

To manage your investments (i.e., shares, mutual funds, deposits, real-estate, businesses run by others, etc.) you should learn the following:

1. Accounting: You should be able to read balance sheets and other financial reports.
2. Investing: Learn about basic principles of investing.
3. Markets: Learn about markets (Stock market, real-estate markets, etc.).
4. Laws: Learn about taxes and other relevant laws and take advantage of them.

Take some risks:  Most of us play too safe because of fear and hence lose out on big gains.  You can take more risks if you have the power of knowledge.  The more you know the more investment opportunities you will be able to identify.  And thus create more assets that generate passive/portfolio income for you.

The book is a nice read.  English is very simple.  You rarely get bored.  I would say it is rather entertaining.  It is also reasonably short which is nice.  However there are caveats.

Caveat 1: At many places the author presents his ideas in such a manner that they sound controversial.  For example, the book seemingly ridicules the idea of getting a good education and working hard throughout your life to get rich.  But if you read it carefully, the author is not saying don't get a good education, or don't work hard.  He is merely saying that these two things may not be enough to get rich.  Getting rich also requires financial education is what he points out throughout the book.  Stating things in a controversial tone probably attracts attention and sales.  However, I would say that it also gets reader's attention to something that should be common sense and yet ignored by many.

Caveat 2: Some specific advice in the book may be dangerous for some one who doesn't know what s/he is doing.  For instance, the author gives examples of how he bought real-estate at a bargain price and resold them quickly to make a small fortune in a short span of time.  However, it took him years of  learning and experience in real-estate market before he was able to make such deals.  In other examples where he did well, he may simply have been lucky.  So my suggestion is to take specific advice in this book with a big grain of salt and focus on overall ideas.

Caveat 3: The book has its own definitions of the terms "assets" and "liabilities" which are different from definitions commonly understood in accounting.  This however does not create much of a problem.

I wish I had read this book a decade or two earlier because that would have strengthened some of my ideas and I would have become financially independent sooner.  Saying that I independently had some of the ideas in the book is not saying much because there is no rocket science in the book.  It is all common sense or rather simple arithmetic.

Rating: ****